(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
| 1:2024cv00515 |
| April 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER Referring Case to Early ADR and Stay of Case signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/22/2024. Deadline to Opt Out: 3/21/2025. (Lawrence, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING 27 Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/20/2024. Waiver of Service and Responsive Pleading due by 12/3/2024. (Lawrence, A)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Noting Voluntary Dismissal Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) of Certain Claims and Defendants; ORDER Directing Clerk to Revise Docket to Reflect Only Named Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 07/25/2024. A. Rodriguez, J. Servin, Chapa and J. Herrera terminated. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 04/30/2024 TRANSFERRING CASE to the Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:24-cv-0515 HBK (PC). Old Case Number 2:24-cv-1034 JDP (PC). (Spichka, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Duclos v. Smith et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
