Great American Insurance Company v. Revolutionary Productions Inc.
Great American Insurance Company |
Revolutionary Productions Inc. and Sum of Us Festival |
1:2024cv01001 |
August 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Potente, Alexander) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Flores, E) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Revolutionary Productions Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Alexander Eugene Potente* *Clyde & Co LLP* *150 California, 15th Floor* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Flores, E) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants by Great American Insurance Company. Attorney Potente, Alexander Eugene added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11705507) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Coverage, #3 Exhibit C - Volunteer Agreements, #4 Exhibit D - Receipts, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Potente, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.