(SS) Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Paul Rene Romero |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2024cv01071 |
| September 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Hall, Benjamin E. added. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page 10-03-2024, #2 Court Transcript Index 10-03-2024, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process 01-03-2023, #4 Payment Documents 01-03-2023, #5 Jurisdictional Documents 01-03-2023, #6 Non Disability Related Development 01-03-2023, #7 Disability Related Development 01-03-2023, #8 Medical Records 01-03-2023 Part 1, #9 Medical Records 01-03-2023 Part 2, #10 Documents Related to Administrative Process 0-03-2024, #11 Payment Documents 10-03-2024, #12 Jurisdictional Documents 10-03-2024, #13 Non Disability Related Development 10-03-2024, #14 Disability Related Development 10-03-2024, #15 Medical Records 10-03-2024) (Hall, Benjamin) |
Filing 7
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/18/2024, Nunc Pro Tunc 09/17/2024: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:24-cv-01071-SKO (SS).. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin, Justin) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Summons, #1 Social Security Complaint, #3 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider served on Commissioner of Social Security. (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 12/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Flores, E)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Francesco Paulo Benavides* *Law Offices of Francesco* *1990 N. California Blvd., 8th Floor* *Walnut Creek, CA 94596*. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Paul Rene Romero. Attorney Benavides, Francesco Paulo added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11741923) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Benavides, Francesco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
