BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc., et al
BMO Bank N.A. |
Barinder Singh Gill and SBFS Trucking Inc. |
1:2024cv01260 |
October 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Ito, Ken) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A.. (Ito, Ken) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/18/2025 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Order re Consent, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Barinder Singh Gill, SBFS Trucking Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ken Ichi Ito* *15910 Ventura Blvd.* *12th Floor* *Encino, CA 91505*. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT against BMO Bank N.A. by BMO Bank N.A.. Attorney Ito, Ken Ichi added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11814080) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ito, Ken) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.