Escobedo v. El Rinconcito Mexican Grill, LLC et al
Jose Escobedo |
El Rinconcito Mexican Grill, LLC and Flipside Christian Church |
1:2024cv01457 |
November 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Sheila K Oberto |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/3/2024. (Lopez Amador, Corina) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/4/2025 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *El Rinconcito Mexican Grill, LLC, Flipside Christian Church* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *1900 Camden Ave.* *Suite 101* *San Jose, CA 95124*. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Escobedo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11897938) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.