(PC) Scott v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
| Floyd Scott |
| California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Warden of Kern Valley State Prison, Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County, Steve Cambra, Teresa Rocha, Edward S. Almedia, Roderick Q. Hickman, James E. Tilton and Matthew Cates |
| 1:2025cv00545 |
| May 8, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 06/04/2025. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER VACATING #6 Amended Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER GRANTING #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 06/04/2025. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations, #11 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
Filing 9
AFFIDAVIT by Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
Filing 8
OBJECTIONS to #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/13/2025. Referred to Judge Sherriff; Objections to F&R due within Fourteen-Days. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
Filing 5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/12/2025. Referred to Judge Sherriff; Objections to F&R due within Fourteen-Days. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:25-cv-00545 KES-SKO. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Findings and Recommendations (Motion) served on Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk EF)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 6/12/2025. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk CRM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CRM)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CRM)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Edward S. Almedia, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Steve Cambra, Matthew Cates, Roderick Q. Hickman, Teresa Rocha, James E. Tilton, Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County, Warden of Kern Valley State Prison, Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison by Floyd Scott. (Deputy Clerk CRM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
