(SS) Mortensen v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kimberly Diane Mortensen |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2025cv01421 |
| October 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER extension of time by Kimberly Diane Mortensen. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF LODGING SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Olsen, Edward Alan added. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records-Part 1, #9 Medical Records-Part 2, #10 Medical Records-Part 3, #11 Medical Records-Part 4, #12 Medical Records-Part 5, #13 Medical Records-Part 6)(Olsen, Edward) |
Filing 11
STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/23/2025. (Deputy Clerk YV)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Extension of Time by Commissioner of Social Security. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The new case number is: 1:25-cv-01421-KES-GSA. (Deputy Clerk CRM) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Social Security Complaint, #4 Summons, #5 Social Security New Case Documents, #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Commissioner of Social Security. (Deputy Clerk AML) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL: Consent or Decline due by 1/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk AML)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena and Bromberg, PC* *3467 W. Shaw Ave., Suite 100* *Fresno, CA 93711*. (Deputy Clerk AML) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/27/2025. (Deputy Clerk AML)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Kimberly Diane Mortensen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Kimberly Diane Mortensen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Deputy Clerk EF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
