(HC)Reverol-Maldonado v. Warden, California City Correction Center et al
| Jose Luis Reverol-Maldonado |
| Warden, California City Correction Center, Field Office Director, ICE Los Angeles Field Office, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv05723 |
| July 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Todd Blanche,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Field Office Director, ICE Los Angeles Field Office,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Todd M. Lyons,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Markwayne Mullin,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden, California City Correction Center (Yu, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Luis Reverol-Maldonado. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 1 2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Todd M. Lyons, Field Office Director, ICE Los Angeles Field Office, Warden, California City Correction Center, Markwayne Mullin by Jose Luis Reverol-Maldonado. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Jose Luis Reverol-Maldonado. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.