Hedrick et al v. Grant
| David Hedrick and Dale Robinson |
| James Grant and Yuba County |
| 2:1976cv00162 |
| March 24, 1976 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
289
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/13/2023 GRANTING the parties' 285 Joint Motion for Final Approval of Second Amended Consent Decree and APPROVING the Notice of the Second Amended Consent Decree provided with the part ies' 6/13/2023 motion (attached as Exhibit A). No later than 15 days after the entry of this order, defendants shall post the Notice of the Second Amended Consent Decree, attached as Exhibit B, in the booking area of the Jail and in a place whe re all incarcerated people being booked into the Jail can see it, in all housing units, in the Jail's library, in the area of the Jail where defendants provide mental health care to incarcerated people, and in the Jail Handbook. Defendants shal l ensure that one or more copies of the SACD are available to class members in the Jail's library and shall make additional copies available to class members upon request. This order shall apply to defendants, their agents, employees, and successors in office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/10/2023 GRANTING in part 278 Request that class member Mary Abbott be permitted to appear at the 5/17/2023 hearing regarding final approval of the SACD, and DENYING without prejudice 278 Request that Mary Abbott be permitted to voice her objections orally at the hearing. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
274
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/8/2023 GRANTING 269 Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Consent Decree. Final Approval Hearing set for 5/17/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. A joint memorandum of points and authorities in support of final approval shall be filed on or before April 19, 2023. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Second Amended Consent Decree)(Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing
270
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/2023 ORDERING that all discovery shall continue to be stayed until the Court grants or denies final approval of the SACD. If the Court denies final approval of the SACD, Plai ntiffs may pursue discovery without the need to re-serve their PMK deposition notices. If the Court does not grant or deny final approval of the SACD prior to 5/31/2023, the ACD shall remain in effect until the Court grants or denies final approval t o the SACD. If the Court denies final approval of the SACD, the ACD shall remain in effect until 5/31/2023 or for an additional 120 days from the date the Court denies approval, whichever date is later. Any motion to enforce or to extend the ACD shall be filed prior to 5/31/2023 or the additional 120 days from the time the Court denies approval of the SACD, whichever is later. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
267
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/2022 EXTENDING the current Amended Consent Decree, approved by this Court on 1/30/2019 and which is set to expire on 1/31/2023, until 5/31/2023, or until approval by the Cour t of the stipulated Second Amended Consent Decree, whichever occurs first. All discovery shall be STAYED until 1/1/2023. If there is no agreement on a Second Amended Consent Decree by 1/1/2023, Class Counsel may pursue discovery without the need to re-serve their PMK deposition notices. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
265
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/17/21 ORDERING Defendants and any third-party with whom Defendants contract to provide medical or mental health care to class members in the Yuba County Jail, including but not limited to Wellpath or its affiliated entities, shall produce to Class Counsel medical and mental health records for specific class members so long as Class Counsel articulates in its request for such records a statement of good cause and the time pe riod covered by the request. Forpurposes of this Order, the term good cause shall mean that Class Counsel hasarticulated a reason for reviewing the records that is related to its monitoring of Defendants compliance with the Amended Consent Decree. Medical and mental health records produced to Class Counsel pursuant to this Order are subject to the Stipulated Protective Order entered by the court February 7, 2017. (See order for further details.)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
261
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/31/2019 GRANTING 244 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the period through 6/30/2018, Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs' $1,100,000 for reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs. For the period from 7/1/2018 through final approval, Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs' $79,500 for reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs. These amounts shall be paid within 30 days of entry of this Order. Interest shall run commencing 15 days from the date of this Order, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
258
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/2019 GRANTING Joint Motion for Final Approval of Amended Consent Decree. See Order for details. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/07/18 GRANTING 240 Joint motion for preliminary approval of amended consent decree. The Notice of Amended Consent Decree attached hereto is approved. Within seven (7) days of this Order, D efendants must post the Notice (1) on the County's official website (www.co.yuba.ca.us/); and (2) in all Jail facilities operated by Defendants, including, but not limited to, in all dayrooms, all medical clinic spaces, the visiting area, and th e intake area in the Yuba County Jail. Copies of the Amended Consent Decree shall be available in the Jail library and made available to Jail inmates upon request. No later than ten days after this Order, Defendants must file and serve on Plaintiffs counsel an affidavit affirming that they published notice as required in the Courts order. Any member of the class may write to the Court about whether the settlement is fair. The Court will consider written communications when deciding whether to ap prove the settlement. Comments must include at the top of the first page the case name, Hedrick v. Grant, E.D. Cal. No. 2:76-cv-00162-JAM-EFB. Comments must be postmarked no later than 52 days after the issuance of this Order, and sent to the followi ng address: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. A final approval hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, will be in the Courtroom of the under signed on January 23, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, to determine whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and whether it should be finally approved by the Court. The hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice. A joint memorandum of points and authorities in support of final approval shall be filed on or before January 9, 2019. Plaintiffs filed a motion for reasonable attorneys fees and expenses on October 24, 2018. A hearing on the motion for attorneys fees and expenses shall be held on January 23, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., the same date as the hearing on the motion for final approval, at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 501 IStreet, Sacramento, CA 95814. (Plummer, M) Modified on 11/7/2018 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
226
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/3/18 ORDERING that the action will not be reassigned as a related case because it has not been shown that assignment to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial savings in judicial effort. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/23/17 ORDERING in light of the ongoing settlement negotiations and conferences, the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively terminate these pending motions 168 , 173 , and 182 . The parties may renew the motions should the ongoing settlement negotiations fail to entirely resolve the case. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
206
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/12/2017 ORDERING the tour of the Yuba County Jail is set for 4/28/2017, at 10:00 a.m.; and any filing concerning the jail tour shall be submitted to the chambers of the undersigned no later than seven days prior to the jail tour. (cc: KJN)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/2017 GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 163 & 182 Motions to Seal. Plaintiffs' 10/24/2016 Request to seal the Stark Declaration and all attached exhibits is GRANTED-IN-PART such th at the unredacted declaration and exhibits will be sealed and redacted versions of such will be publicly filed. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to file a redacted version within 14 day and send the unredacted version to ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiffs 10/24/2016 Request to seal the Stewart declaration and all attached exhibits is GRANTED-IN-PART such that the unredacted declaration and exhibits will be sealed and a redacted version of such will be publicly filed. Plaintiffs are DIRECTE D to send the unredacted version to the court at the email listed. Within 14 days of the date of this order, the parties may submit objections to the public filing of the redacted version of the Stewart declaration. If no objections are filed, the Cl erk shall file the redacted Stewart declaration on the public docket. Defendants' 1/18/2017 Request to seal the Barnes declaration is GRANTED-IN-PART such that the unredacted declaration will be sealed and a redacted version of such will be publicly filed. Defendants are DIRECTED to file a redacted version within 14 day and send the unredacted version the court at the email listed. (Donati, J.)
|
|
Filing
188
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/7/17. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
185
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/20/17 ORDERING that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Consent Decree and for Further Remedial Orders shall be held on February 23, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiffs' Reply shall be due to be filed on February 8, 2017.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/30/16 ORDERING that 174 is GRANTED; the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion shall be held on January 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Defendants Opposition shall be due to be filed on January 11, 2017. Plaintiffs Reply shall be due to be filed on January 18, 2017.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/3/2016 ORDERING that the hearing on Plaintiffs' 168 Motion to enforce consent decree is Reset for 2/1/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; Defendants' Opposition due by 1/18/2017; and Plaintiffs' reply shall be due by 1/25/2017. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/15 DENYING 154 Request to Authorize the Expenditure to Hire an Expert. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/5/2014 ORDERING 139 Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees is GRANTED in PART. The total attorney' fees award is: $7,826.60. 141 (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/2/14 DENYING 95 Motion to Terminate Consent Decree. 134 Request to file under seal is DENIED. Status Conference set for 4/8/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. If feasible, parties shall file a Joint Status Report. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/26/2014 ORDERING that the parties are provided an opportunity to brief whether the consent decree, or any portion thereof, should be modified and/or terminated under Rule 60(b) by no later than 3/31/2014. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/13/2014 DENYING 126 Request to Reopen Discovery. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER DENYING REQUEST to Schedule Hearing signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/7/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/28/14 DENYING 123 Motion for Extension. The conclusory motion filed on 2/10/14 is denied since it fails to precisely specify the grounds for the motion, the standard applicable to such motion, and that under the applicable standard the relief sought should be granted. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
113
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/21/13 ORDERING the effective date of the automatic stay under 18 U.S.C. § 3626(e)(2)(A) is hereby extended until August 11, 2013. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/11/2013 ORDERING it is unclear whether CRLA's response should be considered a duly noticed withdrawal motion to which an opposition or statement of non-opposition is required; CRLA's withdrawal request is hereby noticed for hearing at 9:00 a.m. on 7/1/2013; Motion to Terminate Consent Decree hearing RESET for 7/29/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Waggoner, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
