Kaiser, et al v. Sacramento County, et al
| Joseph Walter Kaiser, Matthew Sasson, Michael Fred Rodriguez, Marie Helen Bellinger and Debra A Wiese |
| Sacramento County and Glen Craig |
| 2:1991cv00300 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
273
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/24/13 ORDERING that Defendants file a response to the objections within fourteen days of this order. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER AMENDING CONSENT DECREE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/6/2013 GRANTING the proposed modification of the existing (Docket No. 216 ) Consent Decree as expressed herein, all other terms of the Consent Decree shall remain unchanged. This order of modification shall become final if no objections are received within 21 days; the court will conduct appropriate proceedings to resolve any objections, if received. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
265
ORDER AMENDING the 216 Consent Decree signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/26/09 and 263 stipulated between the parties. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
262
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/13/09 ORDERING that counsel submit a stipulation and proposed order resolving this matter within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
