Pritchett v. Olivarez

Pritchett v. Olivarez

Plaintiff:	Willie Pritchett
Defendant:	Ana M Olivarez
Case Number:	2:1994cv01010
Filed:	June 1, 1994
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	San Joaquin
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2012	Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/14/12 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
October 23, 2012	Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/22/12 ordering this action remains assigned to District Judge Garland E. Burrell and is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on docume nts filed in this action shall be denominated 2:94-cv-1010 GEB DAD P. The clerk of the court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the 08/28/12 findings and recommendations filed in Yelen v. Olivarez, No. 2:94-cv-1298 GEB DAD P 297 and a cop y of the district court's 10/18/12 order thereon 302 . Plaintiff is granted 14 days from the date of this order in which to file either a request for voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice or a motion to lift the stay. (cc: GGH)(Plummer, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2012

Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/14/12 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

October 23, 2012

Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/22/12 ordering this action remains assigned to District Judge Garland E. Burrell and is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on docume nts filed in this action shall be denominated 2:94-cv-1010 GEB DAD P. The clerk of the court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the 08/28/12 findings and recommendations filed in Yelen v. Olivarez, No. 2:94-cv-1298 GEB DAD P 297 and a cop y of the district court's 10/18/12 order thereon 302 . Plaintiff is granted 14 days from the date of this order in which to file either a request for voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice or a motion to lift the stay. (cc: GGH)(Plummer, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pritchett v. Olivarez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Pritchett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ana M Olivarez
Represented By:	Joan W Cavanagh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?