Yellen v. Olivarez, et al
| Michael S Yellen |
| Ana M Olivarez, J Gomez, J J Pacheco, L Reeves, S Stiles, J Spano and San Joaquin Health Department |
| 2:1994cv01298 |
| August 17, 1994 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
298
ORDER ADOPTING 297 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/17/12 and GRANTING defendants' 282 , 283 and 284 Motions for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
297
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/27/12 ORDERING plaintiff's 05/17/12 motion for leave to file a late opposition to summary judgment 292 is granted. Plaintiff's 05/17/12 opposition is d eemed an opposition to defendant Spano's motion for summary judgment 283 and an opposition to the Corrections defendants' motion for summary judgment 284 . Plaintiff's 05/29/12 motion for an extension of time to file objections to the court's 05/09/12 findings and recommendations 293 is granted. Plaintiff's 06/25/12 objections are deemed timely filed. The court's 05/09/12 findings and recommendations 291 are vacated. Also, RECOMMENDING that the 02/29/12 mo tion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the San Joaquin County Public Health defendants 282 be granted. Defendant Spano's 02/29/12 motion for summary judgment 283 be granted. The Corrections defendants' 02/29/12 motion for summary judgment 284 be granted. Motions 282 , 283 , 284 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
291
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/08/12 ORDERING that the hearing set for 05/11/12 is vacated. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
290
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/30/12; It is ordered that within five days plaintiff shall show cause in writing, if any he has, why defendants' motions should not be granted. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/11/12 ORDERING that Plaintiffs April 2, 2012 motion for extension of time 288 is denied; Plaintiff shall file and serve opposition, if any he has, to defendants pending motions for summary judgment on or before April 20, 2012; Defendants reply briefs, if any, shall be filed and served on or before April 27, 2012; and Hearing on this matter is continued to May 11, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom # 27.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
281
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/15/2012 ORDERING 279 Motion to reopen discovery is DENIED; time for defendants to file their renewed motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 2/29/2012; in all other respects, the provisions of this court's 1/20/2012 Order remain in full force and effect. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/19/12 ordering that within 30 days from the date of this order defendants shall file a renewed motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
277
ORDER adopting in full 274 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 1/18/12. Plaintiff's 259 motion for reconsideration is GRANTED.This court's 3/1/11 order and judgment are VACATED; and this matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
274
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/13/11 ordering that plaintiff's 08/29/11 motion 272 is granted. Plaintiff shall contact the Clerk's office to make arrangements to pick up the bottles that he has submitted to the court. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 04/07/11 motion for reconsideration be granted; The 03/01/11 order and judgment thereon be vacated; and this matter be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Motion for Reconsideration 259 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
265
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/18/11 ORDERING that Motion Hearing for the 259 Motion for reconsideration is set for 6/10/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
255
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to respond to a court order. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/17/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 252 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DISMISSED as MOOT. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
253
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/2011 ORDERING that w/in 10 days, pltf to inform the court in writing whether he intends to prosecute this action further.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/17/10 ORDERING that Pltf's 250 Motion to Reopen Discovery is DENIED; it is RECOMMENDED that Pltf's request for injunctive relief be dismissed as moot. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
