Crittenden v. Calderon
Case Number: 2:1995cv01957
Filed: October 26, 1995
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/24/2013 ORDERING 176 Motion for a Temporary Stay is GRANTED. (Waggoner, D)
June 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 168 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/29/11 recommending that the third factor of the Batson analysis be found in favor of respondent and adverse to petitioner. Claims 1 and 2 of the operative petition should be finally denied. This conclusion, if adopted, finishes the district court work in this case re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Matson, R)
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/21/10 ORDERING that there shall be no extensions of this schedule absent compelling circumstances.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crittenden v. Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?