Martin v. Hubbard, et al
| 2:1999cv00223 |
| February 4, 1999 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| William B. Shubb |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/16/11 ORDERING that the stay is LIFTED; Petitioners response at docket # 127 has discharged the show cause order at docket # 126 ; it is RECOMMENDED that the remaining claims, which the Supreme Court has found to be procedurally barred, reversing the Ninth Circuits decision, be dismissed and this case be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/23/11 ordering that in light of the Supreme Court's subsequent reversal of the Ninth Circuit Judgment, petitioner must show cause, within 10 days, why this case should not be closed.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER ADOPTING 124 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/2010. Temporary stay of proceedingsis GRANTED pending outcome of respondent's Writ of Certiorari Petition US Supreme Court. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
124
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/10/10 RECOMMENDING that a temporary stay of proceedings in this court be granted pending the outcome of respondents petition for writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/27/10 ORDERING that the parties shall, within 21 days, inform the undersigned of the status of the application for wit of certiorari and also make clear whether they are seeking a temporary stay of proceedings in the district court. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/1/09 ORDERING that respondent is directed to file an answer within 60 days to those issues which remain in the fourth amended petition: claims 3, 4, and subparts two and three of Claim 6. Petitioner must file any reply/traverse within 45 days of the filing/service of the answer.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/5/06 ORDERING that the respondent is directed to file a response to those issues with remain, claims 3, 4, and two of the three subparts of claim 6, of the fourth amended petition within 60 days. Petitioner's reply/opposition is due within 45 days of the filing of the answer/motion. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Hubbard, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
