Moore v. Lamarque, et al
Case Number: 2:2002cv00007
Filed: January 3, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Ralph R. Beistline
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/2011 DENYING, as moot, ptnr's 182 request for appointment of counsel and ptnr's 183 request for permission to appeal; and ptnr is ADVISED that documents filed by ptnr since the closing date will be DISREGARDED and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Yin, K)
February 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/16/2011 ORDERING that ptnr's 173 petition for writ of habeas corpus, construed as a motion for leave to amend his sixth amended petition, is DENIED; ptnr's 174 motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED; ptnr's 175 motion for discovery is DENIED; and ptnr's 176 motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. (Yin, K)
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 172 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/13/11 ordering petitioner's 09/23/10 motion for leave to conduct discovery 163 is denied. Petitioner's 09/23/10 motion for an evidentiary hearing 164 is denied. Petitioner's 11/12/10 request for appointment of counsel 169 is denied.(Plummer, M)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/10 denying without prejudice 166 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/23/10 ORDERING petitioner's 04/26/10 motion for an evidentiary hearing 146 is denied. Petitioner's 04/26/10 motion for the appointment of counsel 147 is denied. Petitioner's 04/26/10 motion for leave to conduct discovery 148 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus 83 be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER adopting in full 127 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/16/09. Respondent's 10/30/08 motion to dismiss specific claims 104 , is GRANTED. Petitioner's proposed amendments to the sixth amended petitio n 116 and 117 , construed as a motion for leave to amend the sixth amended petition, is DENIED. Petitioner's 7/13/09 motion for leave to amend his sixth amended petition 122 , is DENIED. Within 60 days from the service of this order, respondent shall file his answer to the remaining claims in petitioner's sixth amended petition; petitioner's traverse, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days after the service of the answer.(Kastilahn, A)
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER denying 130 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/15/09. (Plummer, M)
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/9/2009 ORDERING 128 Motion for Extension is granted in part; Petitioner shall file and serve his objections to the 8/17/2009 findings and recommendations, if any, on or before 9/23/2009. No further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose; and no reply by respondent to petitioner's objections is required unless further ordered by the court. (Matson, R)
August 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/17/09 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to modify the court's docket to reflect that Robert Horel, Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison is substituted as the respondent for this action. Petitioner's 08/03/09 request for a copy of a court document 124 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that respondent's 10/30/08 motion to dismiss specific claims 104 be granted; Petitioner's proposed amendments to the 6th amended petition 116 , 117 filed on 02/26/09 and construed as a motion for leave to amend the 6th amended petition be denied; Petitioner's 07/13/09 motion for leave to amend his 6th amended petition 122 be denied. Motions 104 , 116 , 117 , 122 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
January 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER denying 112 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/08/09. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Lamarque, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?