SEC v. Waldon

SEC v. Waldon

Plaintiff:	Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:	Gregory P Waldon
Case Number:	2:2002cv01395
Filed:	June 26, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Shasta
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit:	Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 77
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 6, 2013	Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/5/2013 GRANTING 29 Motion for Approving Distribution to U.S. Treasury. The Clerk of this Court pay the funds currently held in the Court's registry account in connection with the above captione d action, together with all interest accrued thereon, less any administrative fee payable from such interest in accordance with the Court's rules (which amount, before fees, is approximately $95,227), to the United States Treasury. The C lerk shall deliver payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission together with a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such funds, the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, shall promptly remit the funds to the United States Treasury. The hearing on the motion, scheduled for 2/11/2013, is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
November 29, 2012	Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/28/12, the Commission is hereby ordered to file, within 60 days of the date of this order, a plan for distributing the funds, as contemplated in the Final Judgment. (Kastilahn, A)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 6, 2013

Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/5/2013 GRANTING 29 Motion for Approving Distribution to U.S. Treasury. The Clerk of this Court pay the funds currently held in the Court's registry account in connection with the above captione d action, together with all interest accrued thereon, less any administrative fee payable from such interest in accordance with the Court's rules (which amount, before fees, is approximately $95,227), to the United States Treasury. The C lerk shall deliver payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission together with a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such funds, the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, shall promptly remit the funds to the United States Treasury. The hearing on the motion, scheduled for 2/11/2013, is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)

November 29, 2012

Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/28/12, the Commission is hereby ordered to file, within 60 days of the date of this order, a plan for distributing the funds, as contemplated in the Final Judgment. (Kastilahn, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEC v. Waldon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By:	Susan Frances LaMarca
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory P Waldon
Represented By:	Jeffrey Charles Hallam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?