Hendow, et al v. Univ of Phoenix
Case Number: 2:2003cv00457
Filed: March 7, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 347 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 12/17/09, ORDERING that the Relators Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Relators and as to the US. This case is now CLOSED and DISMISSED. (Kastilahn, A)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 344 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/21/09 ORDERING the Status Conference CONTINUED to 1/4/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Carlos, K)
October 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 338 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/1/09 ORDERING that this Case is STAYED for 45 days including all discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. A status conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 12/14/09. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days before the status conference. Further, the motion filed 4/20/09 254 is deemed withdrawn.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 335 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/18/2009 ORDERING that the parties have not shown a secret filing or proceeding is necessary re: 333 Joint Motion. Clerk shall return the documents submitted for in camera review to defendant's counsel. (Waggoner, D)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 332 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/24/2009 DENYING 238 Defendant's motion to disqualify Plaintiffs' counsel and to exclude the evidence and witness testimony. (Reader, L)
April 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 244 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 04/17/09 ORDERING that the Realtor's 232 Motion to Seal is DENIED. Clerk shall return the documents involved with the sealing request to dfts' counsel. In the future, the parties shall clearly designate what documents are for in camera review and what documents are courtesy copies. (Benson, A.)
April 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/8/09 ORDERING that the University's 225 motion for a sealing order is DENIED; and since the motion is denied, it is unnecessary to reach a decision on the University's 227 request for leave to replace Exh. 1 in the April 6th motion because all the documents the University submitted in conjunction with this motion for in camera review are hereby RETURNED to the University's counsel. (Kastilahn, A)
April 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 220 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/09 ORDERING that the parties' pending Motions to Compel 213 , 214 will be heard on Thursday, 4/9/2009 at 10:00. Telephonic appearance is permitted pursuant to the conditions of which counsel are aware. No further documents shall be filed by either party in connection with these motions absent further order of the court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 209 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/23/2009 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 196 Motion to Compel. (Matson, R)
December 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER re 50 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 11/30/06 re 50 ORDERING that pursusant to the parties' stipulation, all proceedings in this action before this court are temporily STAYED until 12/20/06. Dft's initial response to R elators' Second Amended Complaint is due 12/20/06. If defendant initially responds to the Second Amended Complaint by motion rather than answer, the deadline by which plt must file an opposition to that motion shall be no earlier than January 31, 2007 and the parties shall schedule a hearing date consistent with such deadline; and Relators' and Defendant's counsel of record are to serve each other any filings immediately affected by this order. (See Order for details).(Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hendow, et al v. Univ of Phoenix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?