Decker, et al v. Knowles, et al
| 2:2003cv00799 |
| April 17, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/1/10 ORDERING that the Request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 34 is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/6/2010 re 28 ORDERING that for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's September 16, 2009 findings and recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/15/09 RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Decker, et al v. Knowles, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
