Fitzpatrick v. Wyeth Pharmaceutical, et al
| 2:2003cv01705 |
| August 13, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/12/11. Pursuant to Plaintiff's 11/7/11 MOTION, this Action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/17/11 ORDERING that each Defendant is given ten (10) days from the date this order is filed within which to file an objection to Plaintiff's dismissal filing. In the event this action is not dismissed, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on 11/28/11 is CONTINUED to 1/30/2012 at 09:00 AM. A joint Status Report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
27
MDL ORDER REMANDING CASE. Case reopened. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fitzpatrick v. Wyeth Pharmaceutical, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
