Jordan v. Terhune, et al
| John R Jordan, Jr |
| J. Boitano, W. Brewer, D. J. Brown, T. Cobb, J. Cox, R Dreith, J. Eder, T. Felker, B Fleming, Kaptur, K. McCraw, D. McGuire, S. Peck, S. Platt, J. Rohlfing, D. Vanderville, R. Miranda, D Fletcher, S. Armoskus and K. Kopec |
| 2:2003cv01820 |
| January 22, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
268
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/12/2013 ORDERING that the clerk shall enter judgment for defendants Armoskus, Boitano, Cobb, Cox, Dreith, Eder, Felker, Fleming, Kopec, McCraw, Miranda, Platt, Roholfing, Vanderville, Wong and Wright in accordance with this court's 9/21/2009 order, shall enter judgment for defendant Brown in accordance with the Ninth Circuit's decision, and shall close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/20/2010 ORDERING that the 255 findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2010 are adopted in full and Defendant Brown's 247 renewed motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
255
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/30/10 recommending that defendant Brown's renewed motion for summary judgment 247 be denied. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 247 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/22/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
251
AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/18/09 AMENDING 250 Order; ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 249 is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter; and plaintiffs opposition is subject to the page limits established in the 180 order.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/4/09 ORDERING that defendant Rohlfings 227 motion to strike is GRANTED and plaintiffs 226 sur-reply is stricken from the record. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his filing many irrelevant exhibits as part of his opposition to the motions for summary judgment. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed as to defendants Lopez and Mericle; Def endants 188 motion for summary judgment be denied as to defendant Brown but granted as to the remaining defendants; and defendant Rohlfings 186 motion for summary judgment begranted. Motion referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M) Modified on 7/8/2009 (Davis, D).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
