Brooks v. Alameida, et al
| 2:2003cv02343 |
| November 10, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
190
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/23/11: Recommending that 176 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be granted and the Clerk be directed to close the case. F&R are submitted to the United States District Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/2/11 ORDERING that Defendant's REQUEST for leave to file a dispositive Motion is GRANTED and the 11/17/10 176 Motion for Summary Judgment is deemed timely. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of no opposition to defendants' Motion within 30 days of the service of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/10 ordering within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order to extend the dispositive motion deadline. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff must file a notice of change of address, if applicable. The clerk of the court is directed to serve this order on plaintiff at both addresses listed herein. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/23/10: Warden to produce the inmate James L. Brooks to participate in a settlement conference. (cc: Out-To-Court Desk and Warden).(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/10/2010 ORDERING 166 The 5/11/2010 Settlement Conference is VACATED. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit either a confidential settlement conference statement as c ontemplated by the March 24, 2010 order, or show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with the court's 3/24/2010 order. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/30/10 ordering that plaintiff's 06/01/09 motion for reconsideration construed as a motion for discovery sanctions 154 is granted to the extent that Runnels' objections contained in his untiely responses to plaintiff's interrogatories are deemed waived as decribed herein. It is further ordered that plaintiff's 06/01/09 request for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum 156 is denied as unnecessary. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/09 ORDERING that pltf's 108 motion/request to compel is DENIED; and RECOMMENDING that dft Rohlfing's 117 motion for summary judgment be entered in his favor. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez, Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/28/2009 DENYING as premature 119 Motion in Limine. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooks v. Alameida, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
