Johnson v. Runnels, et al
| 2:2004cv00253 |
| February 4, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER adopting 82 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/15. Petitioner's 80 motion for relief from judgment is DENIED. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/22/2015 ORDERING that, based on the retirement of the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, the Clerk shall reassign this action to a new district judge; and RECOMMENDI NG that petitioner's 80 motion for relief from judgment be denied. Reassigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; the new case number is 2:04-cv-0253 JAM KJN (HC); Objections to the findings and recommendations due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 03/30/11 ORDERING that, re 68 Motion for Certificate of Appealability, COA shall NOT issue this action. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
63
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/10 RECOMMENDING that 14 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/21/10 DENYING 59 Motion to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING 58 Motion for Extension of time. Petitioners reply to respondents supplemental response to the amended petition is due within 60 days of the date of this order; no further requests for extension of time will be granted. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/16/10 ordering that within 28 days of the date of this order, respondent shall file a supplemental response addressing petitioner's prosecutorial misconduct claim discussed above; petitioner may file a reply to respondent's response within 28 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/2010 ORDERING that w/in 14 days, petitioner to file a declaration stating whether he intended to raise in the amended petition the prosecutorial misconduct claim based on the prosecutor's dismissal of an African American juror; w/in 28 days, respondent to lodge the tapes described in the answer at p. 6, fn. 4..(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/10/09 DENYING 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Runnels, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
