Edwards v. People of the State, et al
Petitioner: Ansar Muhammad
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of California and D. L. Runnels
Case Number: 2:2004cv01127
Filed: March 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 02/15/11 DENYING AS MOOT 60 Motion for extention of time to file Notice of Appeal. (Williams, D)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 01/26/11 DENYING petitioners request for evidentiary hearing; DENYING 49 Motion for production of documents; DENYING Petitioners Petition for writ of habeas corpus; A certificate of appealability shall not issue; CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
December 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 11/22/10 ORDERING that Respondents' Request for an enlargement of time is GRANTED. Respondents shall obtain and lodge a copy of volume three of the reporter's transcript by 1/21/11.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 11/30/10: Respondents shall obtain and lodge a copy of Volume 3 of the Reporter's Transcript within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. (Kaminski, H)
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/3/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's 36 motion to amend due to clerical mistake is DENIED. (Yin, K)
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/16/09 ORDERING that this case be reassigned and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. All dates currently set before Judge Karlton are VACATED. All future documents filed shall reference case number Civ. S-04-1127 KJM. (Engbretson, K.)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/24/09 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. People of the State, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ansar Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. L. Runnels
Represented By: Brian Roy Means
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?