Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports US, et al
| 2:2004cv01339 |
| July 13, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/3/2016 ORDERING Plaintiff's 237 Motion for Attorney Fees, Hearing is CONTINUED to 8/25/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
236
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/17/16 ORDERING that the plaintiff's 235 Notice of Request to Seal Documents is GRANTED; plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees, costs, and litigation expenses, together with the supporting declaration of Scott Hubbard, may be filed and maintained under seal. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
231
JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/30/15. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
224
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/28/12 ORDERING that the Parties' Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order to Continue the Trial, Pre-Trial Conference, Pre-Trial Statements Deadline, and all accompanying Pre-Trial deadlines is DENIED. Defendant has appealed the court's permanent injunction. Accordingly, all pending dates are VACATED pending resolution of the appeal. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
213
JUDGMENT and PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/20/12. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/27/12: The Snow Declaration is EXCLUDED from consideration on this motion. Defendant's motion to preclude plaintiff's cross-motion as untimely, is DENIED. Defendant's motion to strike port ions of the Chapman Declaration is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the ADA claim, the Disabled Persons Act claim and the Unruh Act claim. Plaintiff shall submit a Proposed Judgment of Permanent Injunction no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The Pretrial Conference date of September 4, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby CONFIRMED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
209
JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER 206 to amend Scheduling Order signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/6/2012. Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED 9/4/2012 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). Any pary may rely on its Pretrial Statement, if any, file in reliance on the PTO or it mushc file an entirely new Statement in accordance with the Local Rules. Jury Trial is RE-SCHEDULED for 12/4/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/16/12 as to 181 Motion for Summary Judgment : Dft's Motion will be heard on the same date as the Pltf's Cross-Motion. Motion Hearing reset for 3/12/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/13/2011 ORDERING 173 The application for leave to file the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED; and the dates previously scheduled in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order # 166 are still in effect. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/19/11 ORDERING 164 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part; Defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs ADA claims for lack of standing is granted; Defendants motion to dismiss plain tiffs claim breach of contract in violation of the ADA for failure to state a claim is granted. This claim is dismissed with prejudice; Defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs state law claims is denied; Plaintiff is granted leave of twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint in which he may only amend allegations in his complaint concerning whether he encountered certain barriers and remove allegations concerning the breach of contract claim.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/24/2011 GRANTING plaintiff's 157 Ex Parte Application to allow this case to proceed. Plaintiff shall file his Complaint by 9:00 AM on 6/27/2011. Court advises parties to focus on efficient resolution of case. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/16/2011 GRANTING 151 plaintiff's Motion to file an amended complaint; Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within 7 days of the issuance of this order; Further Status Conference set for 7/11/2011 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; the parties shall file status reports 14 days before the status conference. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/4/11: On March 18, 2011, this court ordered counsel for plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not issue for counsel's failure to attach a proposed amended complaint to plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint. Counsel has filed a response. Good cause having been shown, the court finds that no sanction is appropriate.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER denying 142 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/17/11: The court FURTHER ORDERS counsel for plaintiff to show cause for their failure to attach a proposed amended complaint to their motion. Counsels response and the proposed amended complaint SHALL BE FILED within seven (7) days fo the issuance of this order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/13/05 ORDERING that the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports US, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
