Portnoy v. Washington Mutual
Case Number: 2:2004cv01462
Filed: July 26, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 2/28/06 ORDERING The 3/2/06 Status Conference is VACATED. Dft's 2/15/06 motion to confirm the arbitration award 30 is CONTINUED TO 4/13/2006 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (JFM) before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. Any supplemental opposition to this motion shall be filed not more than 21 days from the date of this order; movant's reply is due 7 days after the opposition is served. (Girgis, C)
February 9, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 2/9/06 ORDERING Pltf's request 28 is GRANTED. Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN this action. A Status Conference is SET for 3/2/2006 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (JFM) before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting w/ out counsel. Pltf and counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition. CASE REOPENED. (Girgis, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Portnoy v. Washington Mutual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?