Environmental Pro v. USFS
| 2:2004cv01705 |
| August 20, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 6/25/07 Pursuant to the stipulation, a new environmental assessment is modified to permit the Forest Service to perform the following project-related activities: The removal of timber in three units in the project area prior to issuance of the injunction, The removal of biomass material, treatment of residual slash debris from timber harvest and erosion control on roads. (Cayo, A)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 6/13/07 ORDERING summary judgment GRANTED in favor of Environmental Protection Information Center and the project is enjoined until the US Forest Service has completed a new environmental assessment consistent with the Ninth Circuit's opinion issued on 5/9/07 and filed in this action of 6/12/07. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Environmental Pro v. USFS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
