Paynes v. Runnels, et al
Case Number: 2:2004cv01868
Filed: September 8, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/6/10 ORDERING that the parties provide the court with a new date by which they will file the dispositional documents, not to exceed 60 days from the date of this order. The new date shall be provided within 7 days of this order. (Dillon, M)
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/9/09 GRANTING 70 Motion to Stay. The parties shall notify the court no later than 1/6/10, whether the case has settled.(Dillon, M)
January 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/16/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 59 is DENIED; and Plaintiff's request for an extension of the discovery cut-off date 58 is DENIED without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paynes v. Runnels, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?