Harrell v. Palmer, et al
| 2:2004cv01968 |
| September 22, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Ralph R. Beistline |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/10 ORDERING that 72 Motion to modify the scheduling order is denied as having been rendered moot; and if the assigned district judge in this case declines to adopt the undersigneds August 13, 2010 findings and recommendations, the court will vacate the February 26, 2010 scheduling order and modify the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines, to the extent the court deems necessary. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
76
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/12/10 recommending that defendant's 03/16/10 renewed request for terminating and monetary sanctions 67 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendant' ;s request for terminating sanctions be granted; and defendant's request for montary sanctions be denied. This action be dismissed. MOTION for terminating and monetary sanctions 67 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/2/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Certification of an interlocutory appeal 53 , 54 are DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
63
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER: signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/26/10 ordering Discovery due by 5/21/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 7/16/2010. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/20/09 ORDERING that pltf's 42 renewed motion for an extension of time to file a response to dft Palmer's answer is DENIED; pltf's 42 motion for appointment of an expert is DENIED; dft's 44 motion to compel is GRANTED, pltf to participate in his depo on the date and time to be noticed by dft Palmer w/in 30 days; dft's 44 request for monetary sanctions is DENIED w/out prejudice; and pltf's 43 and 45 motions for a protective order are DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/16/09 ORDERING plaintiff's 09/12/08 request to recuse the state Attorney General's Office from this matter 24 is denied. Plaintiff's 11/19/08 requ est for leave to supplement his opposition to defendants motion to dismiss 33 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that that defendant's 06/18/08 motion to dismiss 19 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendant's motion to dis miss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be denied. Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim be denied. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's damages claims on qualified immunity grounds be granted. Defendant Palmer be directed to file an answer in this matter in accordance with these findings and recommendations. Motion 19 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 15 days. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrell v. Palmer, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
