Padula v. Morris
| 2:2005cv00411 |
| March 1, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/7/14 ORDERING no grounds having been presented that warrant reconsideration, Plaintiff's Motion 276 is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
275
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/22/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff Dayna Padula is ordered to pay Defendants' costs in the amount of $23,183.41. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
271
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/16/2012 ORDERING that costs are taxed in favor of Defendants as stated in their Amended BOC, except with respect to ten (10) cents per page the Court deducted from Defendants' in-house copying charges. Total costs are therefore awarded to Defendants in the sum of $23,511.41. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
266
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/16/2011 ORDERING that the Court DENIES Padula's 264 , 265 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court hereby certifies that any appeal taken from this order is not in "good faith" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
231
STIPULATION and ORDER 230 , signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/7/11, ORDERING, as stipulated by the parties, that Alena Jones will not be called as a witness or be subpoenaed by either side to trial due to her health issues. Ms. Jones will sign a declaration under penalty of perjury setting forth her testimony that will be read to the jury. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
220
STIPULATION and ORDER 219 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/24/11, ORDERING defendant Alana Jones DISMISSED from all remaining causes of action in the First Amended Complaint with prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs, including attorney fees. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
215
STIPULATION and ORDER 214 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/20/11; The parties to this action hereby stipulate to the use of deposition transcripts stamped "Certified" as an alternative to transcripts provided in sealed envelopes from the deposition court reporter. Such "certified" copies shall be accepted for lodging with the Court and use at trial and will be regarded as genuine in all respects.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/12/09 ORDERING that Ms. Padula's MOTION to Amend the PTSO to suspend all further activity in this case until the Supreme Court rules in Fitzgerald is GRANTED. Within then (10) day s of the Supreme Court issuing its decision in that case, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Motion with the Court either requesting reconsideration of the Court's Order granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to her § 1983 causes of action or notifying the Court that no such request will be made. This Case is STAYED until such time, and the 3/2/09, Trial date is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Padula v. Morris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
