California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corporation
Case Number: 2:2005cv00518
Filed: March 16, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Peter A. Nowinski
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 237 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/7/11 DENYING 227 Motion to Confirm End of Stay or, in the Alternative, to Lift Stay. (Meuleman, A)
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 226 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/8/11 ORDERING any party opining that the stay should be lifted shall file and notice for hearing a motion seeking to lift the stay. Further, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on July 18, 2011 is vacated. (Matson, R)
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER granting 210 Motion to Modify Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/1/09: In light of the parties' agreement, the December 2, 2009 hearing on plaintiff's motion to modify the parties' protective or der is vacated, and defendant's motion to seal an unredacted version of its partial opposition to plaintiff's motion and related exhibits, Dckt. No. 215, is deemed withdrawn. The Clerk is directed to return the unredacted partial opposition and proposed sealed documents to defendant. (Kaminski, H)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 205 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/4/09 GRANTING 164 Motion to Stay. This case is STAYED during FERC's adjudication of the referenced FERC filings. (Donati, J)
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/2009 ORDERING 198 CDWR's ex parte request to modify 198 the protective order, is GRANTED; CDWR is permitted to declassify as confidential only those excerpts of the confidential depos ition transcripts of CDWR witness Susan Lee that reflect any assistance, aid or help offered or provided by third parties, including Mieco, Inc., during the California Energy Crisis of 2000-2001; and Defendant's request to modify 199 the protective order, is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L)
August 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 08/11/09 GRANTING the request to extend Designation of Expert Witnesses deadline to 9/18/09. Rebuttal witnesses due on or before 10/19/09. (Manzer, C)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/16/09 ORDERING pltf's Ex Parte Application and Request to continue the hearing date on the Motion to Stay 175 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 111 STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/21/09 ORDERING that the Stipulation for Protective Order is approved in its entirety and shall govern the use and treatment of Confidential Information in this Action until further order of this Court. (Becknal, R)
January 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/09 re 109 ORDERING that this Court's 95 August 21, 2008 scheduling order is hereby modified as follows: initial expert disclosures and report requirements are due on or before May 13, 2009, with any rebuttal expert disclosure due on or before June 11, 2009. All other deadlines set forth in the August 21, 2008 scheduling order remain in effect. (Duong, D)
October 26, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 10/25/05 VACATING 56 Judgment. The decretal portion of the order is amended from a dismissal of the complaint, and plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file the proposed amended complaint within 10 days. Case reopened.(Caspar, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?