Kerns v. Skribner et al
| 2:2005cv00746 |
| April 18, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/23/2012 ORDERING 53 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/27/2009 ORDERING that a certificate of appealability should NOT ISSUE in this action. FURTHER ORDERING that 49 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/2/2009 GRANTING 39 Request for an extension of time; Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file objections to the 1/26/2009 findings and recommendations. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
34
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/09 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kerns v. Skribner et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
