Wilson v. Woodford et al
2:2005cv00876 |
May 3, 2005 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
John F. Moulds |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/14/2017 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 88 are ADOPTED in FULL; The Clerk of the Court is directed to change the short title of this action in accordance with this order; and this action is DISMISSED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 88 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/16/17 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 84 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/22/16 ORDERING that within 20 days of service of this order the parties shall inform the court why this case should not be dismissed. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/22/2013 DENYING without prejudice, plaintiff's 74 motion for enforcement; and DENYING plaintiff's 75 motion for default and sanctions. (cc: DAD) (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilson v. Woodford et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.