McConnell vs Lassen County et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv00909
Filed: May 9, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 329 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/2/10 ORDERING this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all persons and entities who are, or have ever been, a party to this action, save and except Environmental Alternatives Inc. This dismissal shall not preclude pltfs from appealing the summary judgment rendered in favor of Environmental Alternatives Inc. and shall not preclude pltfs from appealing the award of costs and attorneys' fees set forth in docket 310 . (Carlos, K)
January 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 322 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/21/2010 GRANTING 321 Request to appear telephonically at the hearing on Petition for Approval of Minor's Compromise. (Matson, R)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 310 ORDER GRANTING 303 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/15/2009. (Suttles, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McConnell vs Lassen County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?