Smith v. State of California et al
| 2:2005cv01257 |
| June 23, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 08/03/11 ORDERING that defendant Runnels is relieved from filing a pretrial statement. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/14/11 ORDERING that the 125 Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED (cc: USCA). (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/7/2011 ADOPTING 113 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dft's 95 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Pltf's remaining Eighth Amendment claims against dft Runnels are DISMISSED. Pltf to file an amended pretrial statement concerning his remaining equal protection claims within 21 days and dft Runnels to file an amended pretrial statement within 21 days of service of Pltf's pretrial statement. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/10/2011 ORDERING 117 Order on Motion for Extension is AFFIRMED. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/10/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 1/10/11 Request to resinstate Defendants Woodford and Hickman 114 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
113
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/16/2011 RECOMMENDING that dft's 95 motion for summary judgment be granted; pltf's remaining Eighth Amendment claims against dft Runnels be dismissed; pltf be o rdered to file an amended pretrial statement concerning his remaining equal protection claims w/in 21 days of any order adopting the foregoing findings and recommendations, and defendant Runnels be ordered to file an amended pretrial statement w/in 21 days of service of pltf's pretrial statement. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/7/2010 ORDERING that ptlf's 103 request for a stay is DENIED; and pltf has 30 days to file his opposition to dft Runnels' motion for summary judgment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/29/10 ordering that counsel for defendant Runnels file a response to plaintiff's 09/13/10 request for an extension of time within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 05/26/10 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part dft's 85 Motion for Reconsideration as follows: dft has 30 days w/i which to file the motion for summary judgment described above; plf shall file an opposition to the motion w/i 30 days of service thereof. Defendant may file a reply w/i 15 days of service of the opposition; dft's motion for reconsideration is denied in all other respects. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/10/09 DENYING 84 Motion for this matter to be set for trial. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/13/09 ORDERING that pltf's 82 motion for orders is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/11/09 ordering plaintiff file an amended pretrial statement within 30 days. Defendants file their pretrial statement within 20 days of service of plaintiff's statement. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 01/15/2009 ADOPTING 69 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS; and DENYING 45 Request For A Ruling As A Matter of Law; and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 55 Motion for Summary Judgment, as set forth in said order.(Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/28/05 ORDERING that the plaintiff shall submit an affidavit in support of his request for IFP or the filing fee w/in 30 days. The Clerk shall send the plaintiff the proper IFP application. (Sherman, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. State of California et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
