Hall v. Pliler et al
| 2:2005cv01556 |
| August 4, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Ralph R. Beistline |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/15/10 granting 94 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/15/10 ORDERING that the court finds it appropriate to vacate the current trial date. Once the motion for summary judgment has been addressed, if appropriate, the court may reset a trial date.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/25/2010 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to reassign this case to the Honorable Craig M. Kellison as the presiding judge; and the caption on all documents filed in the reassigned case shall show case number 2:05-cv-1556 CMK.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/4/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs status report shall be filed and served within 30 days from thedate of service of this order; Defendants status report shall be filed within 30 days after service of plaintiffs status report; and Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to all parties the form Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge, together with the instant order.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 77 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/14/2009; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kellison ; 72 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; this action will precede on the claims against dfts Ranzany, Ugalino, Lt. Johnson, Connor, Gold, and Goughnour; dfts Pliler, Shrode, Ewing, Kelly, Clavere, Shoemaker, Baxter, Stiles, Rosario, Lord, Murphy, Rogel, Kimbrell, Peterson, Jaffe, Vance, Dr. Johnson, and Phillippi are terminated. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
77
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/09/09 recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment 72 be granted in part, as outlined above; This action proceed on plaintiff's 8th amendment cla ims against defendants Ranzany and Ugalino and plaintiff's due process claims against defendants Ranzany, Ugalino, Lt. Johnson, Connor, Gold and Goughnour. Pliler, Shrode, Ewing, Kelly, Clavere, Shoemaker, Baxter, Stiles, Rosario, Lord, Murphy, Rogel, Kimbrell, Peterson, Jaffe, Vance, Dr. Johnson, and Phillippi be terminated as defendants to this action; this matter be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 72 referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/14/09 ordering that defendants are granted 45 days to and including 02/27/09 to file a motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/15/05: plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his IFP; the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a new IFP application.(Kirkpatrick, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Pliler et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
