Clemon v. People of the State of California
2:2005cv01610 |
August 12, 2005 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/25/2010 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 hc application be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 8/16/05 ORDERING Petitioner's IFP Application 2 GRANTED. Respondent is to respond to petitioner's petition w/in 60 days. Ptnr's reply, if any, shall be filed w/in 30 days of service of answ er. If the response to ptnr's petition is a motion, ptnr's opposition / non-opposition shall be filed w/in 30 days of service, and resp's reply, if any, shall be filed within 15 days thereafter. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order together w/a copy of ptnr's 8/12/05 petition for a writ of HC on AG Jo Graves. (Krueger, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Clemon v. People of the State of California | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.