Scheafnocker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
2:2005cv02002 |
October 4, 2005 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Ralph R. Beistline |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 [VACATED PER 52 ORDER] FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/1/08 RECOMMENDING that Defendant's 5/11/07, Rule 12(c) Motion 42 be denied without prejudice to renewal upon the filing of supplemental bri efing. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge Ralph R. Beistline. Within ten (10) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 2/20/2008 (Benson, A). |
Filing 47 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/1/08 RECOMMENDING that Dft's 42 Rule 12(c) Motion be denied without prejudice. Objections to F&Rs due within 10 days. Motion referred to Judge Ralph R. Beistline. (Engbretson, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scheafnocker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.