Low v. Stanton et al
| 2:2005cv02211 |
| November 2, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/14/2010. CASE CLOSED.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/19/10 ordering the following dates from the court's 04/20/10 further scheduling order are vacated: July 16, 2010 for the filing of plaintiff's pretrial statement and motions to obtain the attendance of witnesses; 07/30/10 for the filing of defendants' pretrial statement; and 08/27/10 for pretrial conference. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties shall notify the court of the status of their settlement negotiations and state whether new dates for the filing of pretrial statements, motions for the attendance of witnesses and pretrial conference shoul be set in this action. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/22/10 denying 222 Motion for an order granting certification to file an interlocutory appeal. Any interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit shall not stay these proceedings. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
214
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/22/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for pltf's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
212
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/10 recommending that defendant Glenn's 03/18/09 motion for summary judgment 195 be denied. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 195 referred to Judge Morrison C. England. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/21/09 ORDERING pltf's motion to call witnesses at trial 121 is DENIED as premature; pltf's motion to strike dfts' documents 157 is DENIED; and pltf's motion to disregard dfts' document and for sanctions 171 is DENIED as moot. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
186
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/5/09 RECOMMENDING that re 127 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 15 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
185
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/22/09 RECOMMENDING that dft Hambright's 125 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that dft Hambright be dismissed from this action with prejudice. Objections to these F&Rs are due w/i 15 days; referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/6/09 ORDERING that pltf's 114 and 120 motions to compel are DENIED.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/05 DENYING 3 Pltf's Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Brown, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Low v. Stanton et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
