Sherman v. Yolo County Sheriff
2:2006cv00018 |
January 11, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Frank C. Damrell |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 CJA 20 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/17/10; Attorney Quin Anthony Denvir for Joseph A. Sherman added. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/16/09 ORDERING that a Certificate of Appealability should not issue in this action re 30 Notice of Appeal. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/10/06 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel, DENYING without Prejudice 3 Motion for Discovery, and DENYING 3 Motion to Stay Execution of Sentence. Re spondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition w/in 60 days. Petitioner's answer due w/in 30 days thereafter. Clerk to Serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the petition for writ of HC on Jo Graves. (cc Jo Graves) (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sherman v. Yolo County Sheriff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.