Allen v. Ornoski

Allen v. Ornoski

Case Number:	2:2006cv00064
Filed:	January 12, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge:	Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 12, 2006	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 1/12/06 re: 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Clarence Ray Allen - GRANTED. 3 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL filed by Clarence Ray Allen - GRANTED. Petitioner's 1/12/06 app lication for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED on the merits with respect to petitioner's claim that his age and physical infirmity render his execution a violation of the Eighth Amendment. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider petitioner&# 039;s other claim that his execution after his tenure on death row amounts to an Eighth Amendment violation because he has not sought permission from the Court of Appeals to file that claim here. 4 MOTION to STAY filed by Clarence Ray Allen - DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Price, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 12, 2006

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 1/12/06 re: 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Clarence Ray Allen - GRANTED. 3 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL filed by Clarence Ray Allen - GRANTED. Petitioner's 1/12/06 app lication for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED on the merits with respect to petitioner's claim that his age and physical infirmity render his execution a violation of the Eighth Amendment. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider petitioner&# 039;s other claim that his execution after his tenure on death row amounts to an Eighth Amendment violation because he has not sought permission from the Court of Appeals to file that claim here. 4 MOTION to STAY filed by Clarence Ray Allen - DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Price, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Ornoski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?