Brewer v. Runnels
Case Number: 2:2006cv00382
Filed: February 23, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 96 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/16/10 recommending that the habeas petition, reduced to 1 claim with two facets, should be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/7/2010 ORDERING 90 that Petitioner be allowed to file a Reply Brief regarding the evidentiary hearing 85 of 3/8/2010, within 10 days after respondent files his brief. (Reader, L)
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/23/10 ORDERING that the documents identified above are to be lodged under SEAL. (Donati, J)
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER AND WRIT ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/11/10 ordering issuance of writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum; Custodian to produce Richard Anthony Brewer at 03/08/10 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge G regory G. Hollows; Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order and writ on the Out-to Court Desk, California State Prison. (cc: USM priority)(3 certified copies sent to Warden, 1 certified copy sent to Out-to-Court Desk)(Plummer, M)
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/24/09 ordering the provisional seal placed upon the reporter's transcript of an in camera hearing, identified as respondent's Lodg. Doc. 9 and filed under seal at docket #59 on 03/06 /09 is hereby lifted and the clerk of the court shall unseal that document. An evidentiary hearing is to be set for the purpose of determining whether or not petitioner's waiver was sufficiently informed, requiring petitioner's trial couns el, Karol Martin Repkow, and any other individual who might have relevant information, to be present as a witness. Counsel are to confer with each other and the courtroom deputy for the undersigned to set a date for the evidentiary hearing within a reasonable time, that is, the hearing should be scheduled on the court's calendar to proceed no later than 90 days from the filing of this order. (Plummer, M)
April 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/17/2009 GRANTING petitioner's 63 Request for Extension of Time. His Traverse/Reply is EXTENDED up to and including 6/1/2009. (Marciel, M)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/17/09 ordering the time for petitioner Richard Anthony Brewer to file his traverse/reply in the above matter is extended up to and including 05/01/09. (Plummer, M)
April 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/01/09 ordering the third party Sacramento County's motion for reconsideration filed on 02/19/09 47 in which respondent joined on 02/25/09 50 is denied on its merits. Sacramento Count y is directed to retrieve the 2001 investigative records submitted for in camera review from the chambers of the undersigned forthwith. The Sacramento County Public Defender's Office is directed within 15 days to produce to petitioner's co unsel for his eyes only the records pertaining to its 2001 investigation of petitioner's trial attorney, Karol Martin Repkow, as set forth more fully. Petitioner's counsel is prohibited from revealing to his client, petitioner herein, or a ny other person or entity, with the exception of staff employees also subject to this prohibition, any of the information contained solely in the records of the Sacramento County Publice Defender's 2001 investigation of trial counsel Repkow at i ssue herein. Petitioner's counsel must file any traverse under seal which relies on cites to, or in any way references any information that is solely contained in the investigative records produced as a result of this order, a version of the traverse from which all such information is redacted may be filed unsealed. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/9/09 GRANTING 44 Motion for Reconsideration; the Sacramento Public Defenders Office is directed to provide petitioner the records pertaining to its 2001 investigation of petitioners trial att orney, Karol Martin Repkow, as set forth more fully above; and respondent is directed to file an answer to the first amended petition 37 , within 30 days of the date of this Order, no further extension of time to be permitted;upon filing of the answer, petitioner will have thirty days to file any traverse/reply. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brewer v. Runnels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?