Shaw v. Kirkland
| 2:2006cv00466 |
| January 31, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY issued re 42 Notice of Appeal signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/23/09. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
37
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 08/21/09 RECOMMENDING that 26 Amended Petition be denied. Matter referred to Judge Karlton. Objections to F and R's are due within 20 days. (Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shaw v. Kirkland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
