Cano vs. Malfi

Cano vs. Malfi

Case Number:	2:2006cv00558
Filed:	March 16, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 23, 2010	Filing 31 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 11/23/10 ORDERING that Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that that Petitioner's Application for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED; Petitioner's 8/16/06 Stay-and-abeyance MOTION be DENIED as moot, and Petitioner's 9/16/08 Request for what may by construed as either a stay-and-abeyance MOTION or a MOTION to Amend be DENIED. These Findings and Recommend ations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Within twenty-one days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 1, 2010	Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 10/01/10 ORDERING that Respondent shall file a full copy of the Superior Court habeas petition; the Superior Court order deciding the habeas petition and the California Court of Appeal habeas peti tion. If none, Respondent shall file a declaration affirming that Petitioner failed to file a habeas petition in the California Court of Appeal. Respondent shall file a copy of the California Court of Appeal opinion deciding the habeas petition, if any. All documents shall be filed w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 23, 2010

Filing 31 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 11/23/10 ORDERING that Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that that Petitioner's Application for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED; Petitioner's 8/16/06 Stay-and-abeyance MOTION be DENIED as moot, and Petitioner's 9/16/08 Request for what may by construed as either a stay-and-abeyance MOTION or a MOTION to Amend be DENIED. These Findings and Recommend ations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Within twenty-one days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

October 1, 2010

Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 10/01/10 ORDERING that Respondent shall file a full copy of the Superior Court habeas petition; the Superior Court order deciding the habeas petition and the California Court of Appeal habeas peti tion. If none, Respondent shall file a declaration affirming that Petitioner failed to file a habeas petition in the California Court of Appeal. Respondent shall file a copy of the California Court of Appeal opinion deciding the habeas petition, if any. All documents shall be filed w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cano vs. Malfi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?