Burke v. Kane et al
2:2006cv00569 |
March 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Garland E. Burrell |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/25/09 ORDERING a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/28/09 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 15 filed 9/10/09 are ADOPTED IN FULL; petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 16 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED; petitioner's 17 request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and petitioner has 30 days to file objections to the 9/10/09 F&R. (Yin, K) |
Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/10/09 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burke v. Kane et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.