Hardwick v. Clarke et al
2:2006cv00672 |
March 29, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Dale A. Drozd |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/23/10 DENYING 44 Motion to Stay as moot. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/8/2010 ORDERING 44 the hearing on the motion to stay filed by Ken, currently set for 12/20/2010 is VACATED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/22/10 ORDERING that Respondent's 10/29/10 Request for a stay 42 is WITHDRAWN. Petitioner's MOTION to Strike 43 is DENIED as moot. The hearing scheduled for 11/29/10 is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/27/2010 ORDERING petitioner is to be released no later than is necessary to process his release, and in no event shall petitioner remain in custody longer than 5 days following issuance of this order.(Matson, R) |
Filing 37 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND TESTIFICANDUM signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/13/10. (cc: Ken Clarke, Warden of California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility and State Prison, Corcoran California).(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 29 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/11/2010 ORDERING that Resp's 25 Motion for a Stay is GRANTED IN PART. The Court's 23 Order is STAYED for 14 days. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be granted with respect to his due process claim and denied in all other respects. Within 30 days from the date of service of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, the California Board of Parole Hearings calculate a term for petitioner in accordance with the requirements of California Penal Code section 3041, with credit for time since the 05/10/05 decision as if a parole date had been granted at that time, and any other term credit to which petitioner is entitled by law. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days. signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/08/10. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/05/06: Petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, the $5.00 filing fee or an IFP application; the Clerk is directed to send petitioner a copy of the IFP used by this district.(Kirkpatrick, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hardwick v. Clarke et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.