Rushdan v. Perbula et al
| 2:2006cv00729 |
| April 4, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/13/10 ORDERING that unless the appellate court remands to the district court, this court is without jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs September 3, 2010 filings.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/23/10 ordering plaintiff's 07/23/10 motion 72 is denied. Plaintiff's 08/19/10 motion 75 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
71
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/10 ORDERING that Defendants 59 request for judicial notice is granted; and the 6/8/10 order is VACATED. It is RECOMMENDED that 59 MOTION to DISMISS be granted and d efendants Ramirez-Palmer, Hall and Van Cor be dismissed from this action; Defendants Perbula and Stratton be dismissed from this action; Defendant Dovey be dismissed without prejudice; Plaintiffs state law claims be dismissed without prejudice; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 56 motion is PARTIALLY GRANTED; pltf has 90 days to serve process on dfts Perbula and Stratton; dfts' counsel to provide pltf w/ a business address or a home address, filed under seal, for Perbula and/or Stratton. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/19/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 68 request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/16/09 ORDERING that pltf's 53 motion for service is DENIED; pltf is GRANTED 30 days to file either an ifp application or a short declaration stating his intention to attempt service of dfts. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/11/09 ordering that plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an in forma pauperis application or a short declaration stating his intention to attempt service of defendants. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/14/09 ORDERING that plaintiff is granted 30 days to either file an in forma pauperis application or file a short declaration stating his intention to attempt service of defendants; Clerk is directed to send plaintiff the form for an IFP application for a prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/17/09 denying 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/28/09 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to issue and send plaintiff 6 summonses, for defendants Perbula, Dovey, Oliverez-Palmer, Stratton, Hall and Van Cor. The Clerk shall also send plaintif f 7 copies of the form Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge with this order. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on the defendants within sixty days from the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rushdan v. Perbula et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
