Hampton v. Sahota, et al
| 2:2006cv00966 |
| May 3, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| David F. Levi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/8/12 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Armster Hampton at 9:00 am on March 12, 2012 in Courtroom 6 before Judge John A. Mendez. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to- Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/14/2011 ORDERING that plaintiff's 86 request for reconsideration and renewed request for appointment of counsel is denied. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER and WRIT HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/9/11 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Armster Hampton at 9:00 am on December 12, 2011 in Courtroom 6 before Judge John A. Mendez. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/09/11 ORDERING the custodian to produce Armster Hampton at 09/19/11 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 6 before Judge John A. Mendez. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/11 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a supplemental pretrial statement; defendants may file a supplemental pretrial statement within 7 days thereafter; The jury trial set for 8/1/11, before the Honorable Judge Mendez is VACATED and reset for 9/19/11, at 9:00 a.m.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/14/11 ordering that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file his pretrial statement, within that time, plaintiff shall also file his pretrial statement. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/17/11 ORDERING that the parties to this action shall each, no later than 15 days from the dateof the order, submit confidential statements as described in this order.(cc ADRP)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/18/2011 ADOPTING 60 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dfts' 45 and 57 summary judgment motions are GRANTED but for the claim that dft Cardeno violated pltf's Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care by failing to ensure that he receive a low iodine diet before his December 2006 ablation therapy and metastasis scans. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
60
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/31/10 recommending that 45 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT and 57 Supplement be granted but for the claim that defendant Cardeno violated plaintiffs Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care by failing to ensure that he receive a low iodine diet before his December 2006 ablation therapy and metastasis scans. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/2/10 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, defendants shall file either a statement that they intend to stand on the pending summary judgment motion or a supplemental summary judgment motion.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hampton v. Sahota, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
