Cotton v. Runnels et al
| 2:2006cv01107 |
| May 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/11/11 RECOMMENDING that Defendants Anthony and Sloss-Pecks 102 motion for summary judgment, as renewed by defendants 124 notice of renewal of motion for summary judgment be granted; and this action be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/22/10 ordering that within 30 days from the service of this order, defendants shall file any amended motion for summary judgment or renewed motion they wish to pursue as contemplated in the court&# 039;s 03/04/10 order. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motions shall be filed within 30 days after service of the motion and defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within 7 days thereafter. If defendants elect not to file an amended or renewed motion for summary judgment within the time provided, the court will issue a further order setting dates for the filing of pretrial statements, pretrial conference and trial before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/03/10 ORDERING that plf's 102 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED w/o prejudice; plf's 104 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; plf's 105 Motion to Reinstate Discovery is DEN IED; plf's 106 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED; plf's 107 Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint is DENIED; plf's 108 Motion for Order Modifying Pretrial Order; plf's 109 , 110 Motions in Limine are DEN IED w/o prejudice as premature; plf's 111 Motion for Approval for judge to allow plf to get declaration via witness Burgess is GRANTED, plf has (90) days from the date of this order to obtain an affidavit from his former cellmate Chris Burgess . The wardens at the institutions where plaintiff and potential witness Chris Burgess are incarcerated are ordered to facilitate communication between the two inmates, either in writing or telephonically at the election of the wardens; plf's [1 13] Motion for a Petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum re plf's presence is DENIED as unnecessary; plf's 112 Motion for a Petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum re Chris Burgess is DENIED w/o prejudice; plf' ;s 116 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. Pursuant to the court's scheduling order in this action all law and motion is closed, save and except that the court will entertain defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment in keeping with this order. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/20/09 ordering within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss and shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for the fail ure to file a timely opposition. In the alternative, if plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this matter, he shall file a request to dismiss this action without prejudice. Plaintiff's 12/31/08 request for an enlargement of time and order to reinstate discovery 68 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cotton v. Runnels et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
