Ramirez v. Runnels
| 2:2006cv01312 |
| June 13, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 01/16/11 DENYING 35 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 11/5/10: 27 Motion to Stay and Abeyance is DENIED. 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS is DENIED. Civil Case Terminated. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 2/22/10 ORDERING that the petitioner file a response to the answer by 4/9/10; case shall be deemed submitted on 4/12/10; every document filed with the Clerk's office must include a certificate of service; petitioner shall immediately notify the Court of a change of address. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 10/01/09 ORDERING that a Sheduling Conference is SET for 11/16/2009 at 08:30 AM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Runnels | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
