Henderson v. Felker et al
2:2006cv01325 |
June 15, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Frank C. Damrell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 190 ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISPOSITION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/13 ORDERING that final dispositional documents shall be filed on or before May 6, 2014.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 188 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/2/13 ORDERING that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than 45 days from the date of this order. All hearing dates set in this matter are VACATED.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 181 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/15/13 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Darren Henderson at 8:30 am on 11/7/13 in Courtroom 9 before Judge. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 179 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/8/13 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send one copy of the documents lodged on August 14, 2013 to Dr. Kraemer at Division of Endocrinology, S-025, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5103 and one copy of the same to plaintiff. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 169 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/17/13 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff or defendants may file objections to the production of plaintiffs medical records from August 2000 through December 2005 or move the court for a protective order governing such production; and if no such motion or objection is filed, defendants shall, within 28 days of the date of this order, produce plaintiffs medical records from August 2000 through December 2005 to the court. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 168 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/12/2013 ORDERING that the 162 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 156 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 163 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/22/13 ORDERING that the court appoints Dr. Frederic B. Kraemer as a neutral expert to assist the court under Federal Rule of Evidence 706. Per the order dated January 24, 2013 148 , the cour t apportions the cost of the expert to defendants to be split equally between them. The Clerk of the Court shall send copies of the filings appearing at Docket Nos. 148, 134-2, 134-4, 134-5, 134-6, 134-7, 125 pages 8-23 and 42-80, and 126 to Dr. Kraemer for his review at Division of Endocrinology, S-025, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5103. (see order for details)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 162 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 157 motion for the appointment of counsel; and RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 156 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K) |
Filing 154 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/6/13 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed January 24, 2013, is affirmed. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 153 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 152 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K) |
Filing 148 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/24/13 ordering within 21 days of the date of this order, the parties shall each submit to the court 3 nominees of physicians with expertise in the treatment of diabetes to potentially act as a n eutral expert in this case. The court will select an individual from these lists to act as a neutral expert as provided in this order. Defendants shall pay the costs of the expert, split equally among them. If plaintiff fails to submit a list of nominees, the court will select the expert solely from defendants' nominees. Defendants' 08/15/12 motion for summary judgment 134 is denied without prejudice to its renewal upon the filing of the expert's report. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 141 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/10/2012 ADOPTING 133 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 106 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. (Michel, G) |
Filing 139 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/28/12, ORDERING that plaintiff's 137 request is GRANTED, and plaintiff has 15 days from the date this order is served to file and serve his objections. Absent a showing of substantial cause, the court does not intend to grant any further extensions of time. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 133 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/14/12 recommending that plaintiff's 11/17/11 motion for summary judgment 106 be denied. Motion 106 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell; Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 132 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/9/12 ORDERING 114 Motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice. Within 14 days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve the January 10, 2012 motion for summar y judgment. Defendants must contemporaneously serve with the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the attached "Rand Notice,"which provides plaintiff with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Failu re to do so may constitute grounds for denial of the motion. If defendants re-serve their motion, plaintiff may thereafter file and serve an amended opposition within thirty days. If plaintiff fails to file an amended opposition, the court will consider his existing opposition in resolving defendants' motion. If plaintiff files an amended opposition, defendants may thereafter file an amended reply within fourteen days.(Matson, R) |
Filing 129 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/29/12 ORDERING 124 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; and 105 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied.(Matson, R) |
Filing 124 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/12/11 recommending that plaintiff's 10/24/11 motion for a preliminary injunction 105 be denied. Motion for Preliminary Injunction 105 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 109 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/01/11 granting 108 Motion for Extension of time. Within 30 days from the date of this order, defenants shall file an opposition to plaintiff's amended motion for summary judgment and ma y also re-file their cross-motion for summary judgment. Defendants 06/16/11 cross-motion for summary judgment 95 is denied in light of defendants' request to re-file their cross motion for summary judgment with their opposition to plaintiff's amended motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 104 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/11 ordering plaintiff's 05/11/11 motion for summary judgment 90 is denied in light of plaintiff's request to file an amended motion. Plaintiff may within 30 days file an amended motion for summary judgment that is complete in itself without reference to the 05/11/11 motion. Defendants may within 30 days of this order, withdraw their 06/16/11 cross-motion for summary judgment and re-file a motion for summary judgment that is complete in itself without reference to the 06/16/11 cross motion. In the absence of such action defendants 06/16/11 motion for summary judgment remains submitted for decision. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 96 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/21/11 ORDERING that the 89 objections are DISREGARDED; 86 Motion is GRANTED to the extent that, within 14 days: (I) defendant Dovey shall serve plaintiff with an amended response to interrog atory number 2; (ii) defendants Dovey and Roche shall serve amended answers to plaintiffs request for admissions, numbers 2, 3, 4, and 5; and (iii) defendant Felker shall serve amended answers to plaintiffs request for admissions, numbers 2, 4, and 5. Defendants may not, in their amended responses, raise untimely objections. In all other respects, plaintiff's motion is DENIED.. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/31/11 GRANTING 93 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME. Defendants shall file and serve their opposition and cross motion on or before 6/17/11. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 87 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/12/11 denying motions to compel 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 . (Plummer, M) |
Filing 80 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/8/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 69 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 are STRICKEN and the clerk to make a notation on the docket to that effect; and pltf's 70 , 79 requests for a court ordered physical examination are DENIED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/7/11 striking 65 Motion to Compel. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/10 ordering plaintiff's amended complaint states and 8th amendment claim against defendants Dovey, Felker and Roche. Defendants Dovey, Felker and Roche shall within 30 days of the date of this order file an answer. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Henderson v. Felker et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.